Layer 2 Solutions 2026: The Ultimate Comparison

Arbitrum vs Optimism vs Polygon vs Starknet. Speed, cost, security. Which L2 wins in 2026?

🚀 Layer 2 Kings

1. Arbitrum (ARB)

Daily volume: $50B+ | Token: ARB | TVL: $4B+

Optimistic rollup. Fastest growing. Most dApps (Uniswap, Aave, USDC live). Fees <$0.10. Gaming dominant.

2. Optimism (OP)

Daily volume: $20B | Token: OP | TVL: $2.5B

Optimistic rollup (same tech as Arbitrum). Good UX. Superchain ecosystem building. Base (Coinbase) L3 = momentum.

3. Polygon (MATIC)

Daily volume: $8B | Token: MATIC | TVL: $1.2B

Sidechain (different tech, more centralized). Cheapest fees. Gaming + NFT dominant. Losing to optimistic rollups.

4. Starknet (STRK)

Daily volume: $2B | Token: STRK | TVL: $600M

ZK-rollup (Cairo language). Cutting-edge. Scalability winner (1000x Ethereum). Risk: immature ecosystem.

📊 Speed & Cost Showdown

L2Avg FeeTPSFinality
Arbitrum<$0.054,000+~1 min
Optimism<$0.104,000+~7 days
Polygon<$0.017,000+~2 sec
Starknet<$0.0120,000+~1 min

🏆 Verdict: Arbitrum wins 2026. Optimism growing. Starknet future tech. Polygon = legacy.